Custom web and mobile applications, API platforms, and the quality engineering that keeps them stable — built by senior engineers working directly in your stack.
Most software projects do not fail in the IDE. They fail because scope was never shaped properly, because the architecture could not absorb the second round of requirements, or because nobody owned the path from a working branch to a production release.
We build software the way a product team does: a small senior pod, a real architecture decision record, working increments every two weeks, and automated tests that run before anything reaches your users. You get the code, the pipeline, the documentation and the ability to take it in-house whenever you want.
These are the measures we baseline at the start and report on throughout — not results claimed in advance.
Line-of-business applications, customer portals and commerce experiences built on a modern, maintainable front end and a service layer designed for the load you actually have.
Cross-platform and native mobile apps, taken from concept through store review and into a repeatable release cadence.
The connective tissue between your systems — designed as a product, versioned properly, and documented well enough that another team can consume it without a meeting.
Interface design grounded in how your users actually work, delivered as a component library your engineers can build against — not a static picture of a screen.
Testing treated as an engineering discipline that runs continuously in your pipeline, rather than a manual phase bolted on before go-live.
Moving business-critical legacy applications forward incrementally, so the system keeps earning its keep while it is being replaced.
Five phases, each with deliverables you can point at. No phase ends on a status report alone.
A short, intense engagement to turn a brief into something buildable — the problem, the constraints, the riskiest assumption, and what the first releasable slice looks like.
Deliverables
Before feature work starts, we stand up the things that are expensive to retrofit: environments, pipeline, auth, observability and the architectural decisions that constrain everything after.
Deliverables
Two-week increments, each ending in something deployed to a real environment that you can use. No status-report-only sprints.
Deliverables
Performance, security, accessibility and resilience testing against production-like data and load, followed by a rehearsed cutover.
Deliverables
Elevated support through the first weeks of live running, then a deliberate handover — either to your team, or into our managed application services.
Deliverables
Different problems want different commercial shapes. We will tell you which one fits, including when it is the cheapest one.
A standing cross-functional team — engineers, QA and a tech lead — working only on your roadmap and reporting into your planning cadence.
A defined deliverable with an agreed scope, timeline and price, following a paid discovery phase that makes the estimate meaningful.
Named engineers billed against actual effort, with a monthly cap you set and transparent time reporting.
Payment tied to agreed, verifiable outcomes rather than effort, with the acceptance criteria defined before work starts.
We pick tools to fit your existing estate and your team's ability to maintain them, not to fit our preferences.
Yes, and we design for it. Source lives in your repositories under your ownership from day one, infrastructure is defined as code, and every engagement ends with documented handover sessions. There is no proprietary SegaKIV framework you would have to keep paying for.
We do not give a firm number before discovery, because an estimate without shaped scope is a guess with a decimal point. We run a short paid discovery, then give you a range with the assumptions written down, so you can see which assumptions move the number.
Named senior engineers you interview before the engagement starts. We are a small firm, which means the people you meet in the sales conversation are the people on the project — you are not handed to a different team after signature.
Our India delivery centre overlaps the US morning, and every pod commits to a fixed overlap window agreed with you. Standups, demos and escalations happen inside that window; deep work happens outside it. In practice this gives you an engineering day that extends past your own.
They will, and the process assumes it. Changes are surfaced against the burn-up at the sprint boundary with a cost and schedule impact attached, so the trade-off is an explicit decision you make rather than a surprise at the end.
A short conversation is usually enough to tell whether we're the right fit. If we're not, we'll say so and point you somewhere better.
Or email us directly at reachus@segakiv.com
